冰区航行中船舶结构冰载荷的现场测量与反演方法研究进展

王键伟; 段庆林; 季顺迎

doi:10.6052/1000-0992-20-007

冰区航行中船舶结构冰载荷的现场测量与反演方法研究进展

doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-20-007

大连理工大学工业装备结构分析国家重点实验室, 辽宁大连 116023

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划重点专项 (2017YFE0111400, 2016YFC1401505, 2016YFC1402706)、装备预研联合基金 (6141B03070108) 和国家自然科学基金 (51639004, 41576179) 资助项目.

详细信息

作者简介:
季顺迎, 大连理工大学工程力学系教授, 博士生导师.现任辽宁省极地海洋工程研究中心主任、国际离散元方法学术委员会委员、美国ASCE工程力学专业委员会颗粒材料分委员会委员、环境力学专业委员会委员、计算力学专业委员会颗粒材料计算力学专业组成员.主要从事计算颗粒力学、极地海洋工程、有砟铁路轨道动力特性、航空航天着陆冲击过程等方面的研究工作.近年来主持国家自然科学基金项目、国家海洋领域公益性项目、国家重点研发计划项目、工信部高技术船舶科研项目等科研课题30余项,出版学术著作2部, 发表期刊学术论文150余篇, 获国家发明专利8项,计算机软件著作权20余项, 省部级奖励5项.

通讯作者:
季顺迎

中图分类号: U663.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 2364
- HTML全文浏览量: 640
- PDF下载量: 274
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-04-17
- 刊出日期: 2020-10-08

Research progress of field measurements and inversion methods of ice loads on ship structure during ice navigation

State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China

More Information

Corresponding author: JI Shunying

摘要

摘要: 冰载荷是影响极地船舶航行安全的重要环境因素,而对船舶结构的现场监测是获取冰载荷的可靠途径.鉴于船-冰相互作用的复杂性, 目前还难以直接测量冰载荷,一般通过结构应变、六自由度运动参数等船舶结构局部或总体响应的测量数据间接反演冰载荷.根据冰载荷的作用范围,本文将船舶结构冰载荷现场监测划分为局部冰载荷现场监测与总体冰载荷现场监测两大类.对国内外18艘极地船舶冰载荷现场测量试验的开展时间、试验海域、测量方案等信息进行了系统的总结和分析.从基本原理、适用范围、应用现状和发展前景等方面全面地介绍了船舶结构冰载荷反演的影响系数矩阵法、支持向量机法、格林函数法、运动参数法和功能关系法,并重点分析了"MV Timofey Guzhenko"极地穿梭油轮与"IBRV Araon"破冰考察船的冰载荷测量结果.在此基础上对船体局部冰压、冰力峰值、冰载荷概率分布和冰激振动加速度等相关研究进展进行了深入的讨论.最后从测量技术、反演方法、冰载荷特性等方面剖析了当前船舶结构冰载荷现场监测中存在的问题,并探讨了相应的研究方向.本文对国内外极地船舶冰载荷现场测量与反演方法的论述可为后续研究与工程应用提供科学参考,从而更好地促进我国极地船舶的抗冰结构设计与冰区航行技术的发展.
- 极地船舶结构 /
- 冰载荷 /
- 现场测量 /
- 反演方法 /
- 冰区航行
Abstract: The ice load is an important environmental factor affecting the navigation safety of polar ships. The field monitoring of ship structure is a reliable approach to obtain the ice load. In view of the complexity of the ship-ice interaction, it is currently difficult to measure the ice load directly. Generally, the ice load is inverted indirectly through the measured data of the local or global response of ship structure, such as structural strains and six-degrees-of-freedom motion parameters. Firstly, according to the action scope of the ice load, the monitoring methods of the ice load on ship structure are divided into two categories in this paper, i.e., those for local ice loads and those for global ice loads. The information such as the date, the area, and the measurement scheme of ice load field measurements for 18 polar ships is systematically summarized and analyzed. Then, five ice load inversion methods for ship structure such as Influence Coefficient Matrix Method, Support Vector Machine Method, Green's Function Method, Motion Parameter Method, and Work-energy Relationship Method are comprehensively introduced from the aspects of fundamental principles, application scope, strengths and weaknesses, application status, and development prospects. The field measurement results of the Arctic shuttle tanker, MV Timofey Guzhenko, and the icebreaking research vessel, IBRV Araon, are emphatically analyzed. On this basis, the related research progress of the local ice pressure, the peak ice force, the probability distribution of ice loads, and the ice-induced vibration acceleration are discussed in depth. Finally, the problems existing in the ice load field monitoring for ship structure are dissected from three aspects, including measurement technology, inversion methods, and ice load characteristics. Moreover, the corresponding research directions are discussed. The review of field measurements and inversion methods of ice loads on ship structure in this paper can provide scientific reference for subsequent research and engineering applications, so as to better promote the development of ice-resistant structure design and ice navigation technology of polar ships in our country.
- polar ship structure /
- ice load /
- field measurement /
- inversion method /
- ice navigation

HTML全文

参考文献(97)

[1]	陈晓东, 崔海鑫, 王安良, 季顺迎 . 2020. 基于巴西盘试验的海冰拉伸强度研究. 力学学报, 52:625-634 (Chen X D, Cui H X, Wang A L, Ji S Y . 2020. Experimental study on sea ice tensile strength based on Brazilian tests. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 52: 625-634).
[2]	崔洪宇, 胡大士, 孔帅, 季顺迎 . 2020. 基于正则化方法的雪龙号破冰船冰载荷反演的研究. 中国造船, 61:109-119 (Cui H Y, Hu D S, Kong S, Ji S Y . 2020. Study on inversion of ice load for Xue Long icebreaker based on regularization method. Shipbuilding of China, 61: 109-119).
[3]	狄少丞, 季顺迎 . 2014. 海冰与自升式海洋平台相互作用GPU离散元模拟. 力学学报, 46:561-571 (Di S C, Ji S Y . 2014. GPU-based discrete element modelling of interaction between sea ice and jack-up platform structure. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 46: 561-571).
[4]	韩端锋, 乔岳, 薛彦卓, 王庆, 王国亮 . 2017. 冰区航行船舶冰阻力研究方法综述. 船舶力学, 21:1041-1054 (Han D F, Qiao Y, Xue Y Z, Wang Q, Wang G L . 2017. A review of ice resistance research methods for ice-going ships. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 21: 1041-1054).
[5]	郝晓光, 朱建钢, 薛怀平, 徐汉卿, 刘根友, 廖小韵 . 2005. 中国第21次南极考察雪龙船实时航迹图. 极地研究, 17:134-138 (Hao X G, Zhu J G, Xue H P, Xu H Q, Liu G Y, Liao X Y . 2005. The real-time tracking map of Xuelong ship during 21th Chinese Antarctic expedition. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 17: 134-138).
[6]	季顺迎, 雷瑞波, 李春花, 蔡柯 . 2017. "雪龙"号科考船在冰区航行的船体振动测量研究. 极地研究, 29:427-435 (Ji S Y, Lei R B, Li C H, Cai K . 2017. Measurement of ice-induced local vibration of R/V Xuelong icebreaker during its navigation in ice-covered fields. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 29: 427-435).
[7]	孔帅 . 2020. 船体结构冰载荷的离散元分析及监测识别方法. [博士论文]. 大连: 大连理工大学 (Kong S . 2020. Discrete element analysis and identification methods of ice loads on ship structure. [PhD Thesis]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology).
[8]	孔帅, 崔洪宇, 季顺迎 . 2020 a. 船舶结构海冰载荷的实船测量及反演方法研究. 振动与冲击, 39:8-16 (Kong S, Cui H Y, Ji S Y . 2020a. Field measurement and identification method of sea ice load on ship structure. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 39: 8-16).
[9]	孔帅, 崔洪宇, 季顺迎 . 2020 b. 船体结构冰载荷反演方法及试验验证. 中国机械工程, 31:281-288 (Kong S, Cui H Y, Ji S Y . 2020b. Ice load identification method of ship structures and experimental verification. China Mechanical Engineering, 31: 281-288).
[10]	李紫麟, 刘煜, 孙珊珊, 卢云亮, 季顺迎 . 2013. 船舶在碎冰区航行的离散元模型及冰载荷分析. 力学学报, 45:868-877 (Li Z L, Liu Y, Sun S S, Lu Y L, Ji S Y . 2013. Analysis of ship maneuvering performances and ice loads on ship hull with discrete element model in broken-ice fields. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 45: 868-877).
[11]	刘璐, 龙雪, 季顺迎 . 2015. 基于扩展多面体的离散单元法及其作用于圆桩的冰载荷计算. 力学学报, 47:1046-1057 (Liu L, Long X, Ji S Y . Dilated polyhedral based discrete element method and its application of ice load on cylindrical pile. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 47:1046-1057).
[12]	刘璐, 尹振宇, 季顺迎 . 2019. 船舶与海洋平台结构冰载荷的高性能扩展多面体离散元方法. 力学学报, 51:1720-1739 (Liu L, Yin Z Y, Ji S Y . High-performance dilated polyhedral based DEM for ice loads on ship and offshore platform structures. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 51:1720-1739).
[13]	刘瀛昊 . 2017. 极地航行船舶冰载荷反演方法及应用研究. [博士论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学 (Liu Y H . 2017. Research on ice load inverse method and application of polar navigation ship. [PhD Thesis]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University).
[14]	刘瀛昊 , Suominen M, Kujala P. 2016. 基于反向方法的船体冰载荷研究. 船舶力学, 20:1604-1618 (Liu Y H, Suominen M, Kujala P . 2016. Research of ice-induced load on a ship hull based on an inverse method. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 20: 1604-1618).
[15]	刘瀛昊, 佟福山, 高良田 . 2017. 基于原型测量的极地航行船舶船体冰载荷分析. 振动与冲击, 36:226-233 (Liu Y H, Tong F S, Gao L T . 2017. Ice-induced load analysis for hull of an ice-going vessel based on full-scale measurement. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 36: 226-233).
[16]	龙雪, 刘社文, 季顺迎 . 2019. 水位变化对正倒锥体冰载荷影响的离散元分析. 力学学报, 51:74-84 (Long X, Liu S W, Ji S Y . Influence of water level on ice load on upward-downward conical structure based on DEM analysis. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 51: 74-84).
[17]	马龙, 安磊, 张晓辉, 郑中义, 李振华, 陈冠文 . 2019. 北极东北航线2006-2015年通航窗口数据集. 全球变化数据学报, 3:244-251 (Ma L, An L, Zhang X H, Zheng Z Y, Li Z H, Chen G W . 2019. Navigable window dataset of the Arctic northeast passage (2006-2015). Global Change Research Data Publishing & Repository, 3:244-251).
[18]	马龙, 王加跃, 刘星河, 李振华 . 2018. 北极东北航道通航窗口研究. 海洋预报, 35:52-59 (Ma L, Wang J Y, Liu X H, Li Z H . 2018. Research in navigable windows of the northwest passage. Marine Forecasts, 35: 52-59).
[19]	孙慧, 赵炎平, 汪大立, 顾捷伟, 李中月 . 2019. "雪龙 2"船体监测及辅助决策系统设计. 舰船科学技术, 41:55-58 (Sun H, Zhao Y P, Wang D L, Gu J W, Li Z Y . 2019. Design of Xuelong 2 ship structure monitoring and assistant decision-making system. Ship Science and Technology, 41: 55-58).
[20]	县彦宗, 魏立新, 张海影, 张彤 . 2009. 第三次北极考察航线气象状况及预报. 海洋预报, 26:53-60 (Xian Y Z, Wei L X, Zhang H Y, Zhang T . 2009. Meteorological status and forecast of the 3rd Arctic survey route. Marine Forecasts, 26: 53-60).
[21]	张学工 . 2000. 关于统计学习理论与支持向量机. 自动化学报, 26:32-42 (Zhang X G . 2000. Introduction to statistical learning theory and support vector machines. Acta Automatica Sinica, 26: 32-42).
[22]	中国船级社. 2016. 极地船舶指南. 北京: 人民交通出版社 ( CCS. Guidelines for Polar Ship. 2016. Beijing: China Communications Press).
[23]	Bekker A, Suominen M, Peltokorpi O, Kulovesi J, Kujala P, Karhunen J. 2014. Full-scale measurements on a polar supply and research vessel during maneuver tests in an ice field in the Baltic Sea// 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, San Francisco, California, USA.
[24]	Broman M, Nordqvist P. 2013. Global response of ship hull during ramming of heavy ice features. [Master Thesis]. G?teborg: Chalmers University of Technology.
[25]	Chernov A V. 2009. Measuring total ship bending with a help of tensometry during the full-scale in situ ice impact study of icebreaker "Kapitan Nikolaev"// 20th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Lule?, Sweden, 1:211-219.
[26]	Choi J, Park G, Kim Y, Jang K, Park S, Ha M. 2009. Ice load monitoring system for large Arctic shuttle tanker// International Conference on Ship and Offshore Technology, Busan, Korea, 1:39-43.
[27]	Choi K, Cheon E J, Kim H Y, Nam J H, Lee T K. 2015. Comparison of peak ice pressures on the IBRV Araon during the planned and the unusual ice transits// 23rd International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Trondheim, Norway.
[28]	Fenz D, Younan A, Piercey G, Barrett J, Ralph F, Jordaan I. 2018. Field measurement of the reduction in local pressure from ice management. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 156:75-87.
[29]	Frederking R. 1999. The local pressure-area relation in ship impact with ice// 15th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Helsinki, Finland, 2:687-696.
[30]	Frederking R. 2000. Local ice pressures from the Louis S. St. Laurent 1994 North Pole transit. Ottawa: Canadian Hydraulics Centre, National Research Council of Canada.
[31]	Frederking R. 2005. Local ice pressures on the Oden 1991 polar voyage// 18th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Potsdam, NY, USA, 1:353-364.
[32]	Frederking R, Johnston M. 2008. Comparison of local ice pressures on the CCGS Terry Fox with other data// 18th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1:650-654.
[33]	Frederking R. 2010. Ice loading on a ship in discontinuous ice// 20th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, China, 1:1188-1195.
[34]	Fredriksen ?. 2012. Ice-induced loading on ship hull during ramming. [Master Thesis]. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Techonology.
[35]	Gagnon R. 2008 a. A new impact panel to study bergy bit/ship collisions// 19th IAHR International Symposium on Ice, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
[36]	Gagnon R. 2008 b. Analysis of data from bergy bit impacts using a novel hull-mounted external impact panel. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 52:50-66.
[37]	Golub G H, Heath M, Wahba G. 1979. Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics, 21:215-223.
[38]	Hansen P C, O'Leary D P. 1993. The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 14:1487-1503.
[39]	Huang Y, Huang S Y, Sun J Q. 2018. Experiments on navigating resistance of an icebreaker in snow covered level ice. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 152:1-14.
[40]	Iyerusalimskiy A, Choi J, Park G, Kim Y, Yu H, John J S. 2011. The interim results of the long-term ice loads monitoring on the large Arctic tanker// 21st International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Montréal, Canada, 2:1279-1288.
[41]	Jeon M, Min J K, Choi K, Ha J S. 2017. Estimation of local ice load by analyzing shear strain data for the IBRV Araon// 24th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Busan, Korea.
[42]	Jeon M, Choi K, Min J K, Ha J S. 2018. Estimation of local ice load by analyzing shear strain data from the IBRV Araon's 2016 Arctic voyage. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 10:421-425.
[43]	Jo Y C, Choi J H, Park S G, Han S. 2017. Sensor arrangement for ice load monitoring to estimate local ice load in Arctic vessel// 24th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Busan, Korea.
[44]	Johnston M. 2006. Evolution of an inertial measurement system called MOTAN: Summary of installations on five ice-strengthened ships// 7th International Conference and Exhibition on Performance of Ships and Structures in Ice, Banff, AB, Canada, 1:145-152.
[45]	Johnston M, Frederking R, Timco G W. 2001. Whole-ship motions and accelerations at the stern of the CCGS Louis S. St. Laurent October 2000 ice trials. Ottawa: Canadian Hydraulics Centre, National Research Council of Canada.
[46]	Johnston M, Frederking R, Timco G W, Miles M. 2003 a. Ice-induced global loads on USCGC Healy and CCGS Louis S. St. Laurent as determined from whole-ship motions. Ottawa: Canadian Hydraulics Centre, National Research Council of Canada.
[47]	Johnston M, Frederking R, Timco G W, Miles M. 2003 b. MOTAN: A novel approach for determining ice-induced global loads on ships// MARI-TECH, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
[48]	Johnston M, Frederking R, Timco G W, Miles M. 2004. Using MOTAN to measure global accelerations of the CCGS Terry Fox during bergy bit trials// International Conference on Offshore and Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 3:911-918.
[49]	Johnston M, Ritch R, Gagnon R. 2008. Comparison of impact forces measured by different instrumentation systems on the CCGS Terry Fox during the bergy bit trials. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 52:83-97.
[50]	Johnston M, Timco G W, Frederking R, Miles M. 2001. Whole-ship motions of USCGC Healy as applied to global ice impact forces// 16th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 1:955-964.
[51]	Johnston M, Timco G W, Frederking R, Miles M. 2008. Measuring global impact forces on the CCGS Terry Fox with an inertial measurement system called MOTAN. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 52:67-82.
[52]	Kim T W, Kim H N, Choi K, Lee T K. 2014. Study on influence of ship speed on local ice loads on bow of the IBRV Araon// 24th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Busan, Korea, 1:1159-1164.
[53]	Kong S, Cui H Y, Tian Y K, Ji S Y. 2020. Identification of ice loads on shell structure of ice-going vessel with Green kernel and regularization method. Marine Structures, 74:102820.
[54]	Kotilainen M, Vanhatalo J, Suominen M, Kujala P. 2017. Predicting ice-induced load amplitudes on ship bow conditional on ice thickness and ship speed in the Baltic Sea. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 135:116-126.
[55]	Krupina N A, Chernov A V. 2009. Measuring global ice forces during the full-scale ice impact study of icebreaker "Kapitan Nikolaev"// 20th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Lule?, Sweden, 1:290-299.
[56]	Krupina N A, Likhomanov V A, Chernov A V, Gudoshnikov Y P. 2009. Full-scale ice impact study of icebreaker Kapitan Nikolaev: General description// 19th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Osaka, Japan, 1:614-620.
[57]	Kujala P. 1989. Results of long-term ice load measurements on board chemical tanker Kemira during the winters 1985 to 1988. Espoo: Technical Research Centre of Finland Ship Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology Laboratory of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering.
[58]	Kujala P, Suominen M, Riska K. 2009. Statistics of ice loads measured on MT Uikku in the Baltic// 20th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Lule?, Sweden, 1:415-425.
[59]	Kujala P, Jiang Z Y, Li F, Lu L L. 2019. Long term prediction of local ice loads on the hull of S. A. Agulhas II// 25th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Delft, Netherlands.
[60]	Kwon Y H, Lee T K, Choi K. 2015. A study on measurements of local ice pressure for ice breaking research vessel "Araon" at the Amundsen Sea. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 7:490-499.
[61]	Lee J H, Hwang M R, Kwon S W, Kang J G. 2015. Analysis of local ice load signals measured on an arctic voyage in 2013// 23rd International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Trondheim, Norway.
[62]	Lee J H, Kwon Y H, Rim C W, Lee T K. 2016. Characteristics analysis of local ice load signals in ice-covered water. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 8:66-72.
[63]	Lee J M, Lee C J, Kim Y S, Choi G G, Lew J M. 2016. Determination of global ice loads on the ship using the measured full-scale motion data. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 8:301-311.
[64]	Lee S C, Park S, Choi K, Jeong S Y. 2017. Global ice load prediction for the icebreaker using 6-DOF motion measurement method// 24th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Busan, Korea.
[65]	Lee S C, Park S, Choi K, Jeong S Y. 2018. Prediction of ice loads on Korean IBRV Araon with 6-DOF inertial measurement system during trials of Chukchi and east Siberian Seas. Ocean Engineering, 151:23-32.
[66]	Lee T K, Lee J H, Kim H, Rim C W. 2014. Field measurement of local ice pressures on the Araon in the Beaufort Sea. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 6:788-799.
[67]	Leira B J, B?rsheim L. 2008. Estimation of ice loads on a ship hull based on strain measurements// 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Estoril, Portugal, 3:947-953.
[68]	Leira B J, B?rsheim L, Espeland ?, Amdahl J. 2009 a. Assessment of ice-induced loads on ship hulls based on continuous response monitoring// 2nd International Conference on Marine Structures, Lisbon, Portugal, 1:345-353.
[69]	Leira B J, B?rsheim L, Espeland ?, Amdahl J. 2009 b. Ice-load estimation for a ship hull based on continuous response monitoring. Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 223:529-540.
[70]	Lensu M, H?nninen S. 2003. Short term monitoring of ice loads experienced by ships// 17th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Trondheim, Norway, 2:535-546.
[71]	Li F, Goerlandt F, Kujala P, Lehtiranta J, Lensu M. 2018. Evaluation of selected state-of-the-art methods for ship transit simulation in various ice conditions based on full-scale measurement. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 151:94-108.
[72]	Lindqvist G. 1989. A straightforward method for calculation of ice resistance of ships// 10th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Lule?, Sweden, 1:722-735.
[73]	Liu S W, Yu H, Won D. 2009. FEA for determination of data reduction matrix and critical stress influence matrixes. Spring: ABS.
[74]	Lubbad R, L?set S. 2016. Oden arctic technology research cruise 2015// Arctic Technology Conference, St. John's, NL, Canada.
[75]	Nyseth H, Frederking R, Sand B. 2013. Evaluation of global ice load impacts based on real-time monitoring of ship motions// 22nd International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Espoo, Finland.
[76]	Piercey G, Ralph F, Barrett J, Macneill A, Jordaan I, Younan A, Fenz D. 2016. Design of a shipboard local load measurement system to collect managed ice load data// Arctic Technology Conference, St. John's, NL, Canada.
[77]	Ralph F, McKenna R, Gagnon R. 2008. Iceberg characterization for the bergy bit impact study. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 52:7-28.
[78]	Ringsberg J W, Broman M, Nordqvist P. 2014. Development of a model for global response of ship hull during ramming of heavy ice features// 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, San Francisco, California, USA.
[79]	Riska K, Kujala P, Vuorio J. 1983. Ice load and pressure measurements on board I. B. Sisu// 7th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Helsinki, Finland, 2:1055-1069.
[80]	Riska K, Uto S, Tuhkuri J. 2002. Pressure distribution and response of multiplate panels under ice loading. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 34:209-225.
[81]	Ritch R, Frederking R, Johnston M, Browne R, Ralph F. 2008. Local ice pressures measured on a strain gauge panel during the CCGS Terry Fox bergy bit impact study. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 52:29-49.
[82]	Suominen M, Karhunen J, Bekker A, Kujala P, Elo M, Polach R B, Enlund H, Saarinen S. 2013. Full-scale measurements on board PSRV S.A. Agulhas II in the Baltic Sea// 22nd International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Espoo, Finland.
[83]	Suominen M, Kujala P, Romanoff J, Remes H. 2017. Influence of load length on short-term ice load statistics in full-scale. Marine Structures, 52:153-172.
[84]	Suyuthi A, Leira B J. 2010. Variation of the short term extreme ice loads along a ship hull// 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Shanghai, China, 4:783-792.
[85]	Suyuthi A, Leira B J, Riska K. 2011. Full scale measurement on level ice resistance of icebreaker// 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1:983-989.
[86]	Suyuthi A, Leira B J, Riska K. 2012. Short term extreme statistics of local ice loads on ship hulls. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 82:130-143.
[87]	Suyuthi A, Leira B J, Riska K. 2013. Statistics of local ice load peaks on ship hulls. Structural Safety, 40:1-10.
[88]	Suyuthi A, Leira B J, Riska K. 2014. A generalized probabilistic model of ice load peaks on ship hulls in broken-ice fields. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 97:7-20.
[89]	Takimoto T, Kanada S, Shimoda H, Wako D, Uto S, Izumiyama K. 2008. Field measurements of local ice load on a ship hull in pack ice of the southern Sea of Okhotsk// OCEANS'08 MTS/IEEE Kobe-Techno-Ocean'08, Kobe, Japan.
[90]	Takimoto T, Uto S, Oka S, Murakami C, Izumiyama K. 2006. Measurement of ice load exerted on the hull of icebreaker Soya in the southern Sea of Okhotsk// 18th IAHR International Symposium on Ice, Dunedin, New Zealand, 1:41-48.
[91]	Takimoto T, Wako D. 2007. Ice loads on ship hulls in pack ice conditions// 19th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Dalian, China, 1:267-276.
[92]	Timofeev O, Egorov B, Klenov A, Krupina N. 1999. Measurement of ice loads onboard icebreaker $<<$kapitan>>$ during ARCDEV-expedition// 15th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Espoo, Finland, 2:747-756.
[93]	Uto S, Oka S, Murakami C, Takimoto T, Izumiyama K. 2005. Ice load exerted on the hull of icebreaker PM Teshio in the south Sea of Okhotsk// 18th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Potsdam, NY, USA, 2:683-692.
[94]	Valkonen J. 2013. Uncertainty of a methodology to estimate global ship loads during interaction events with ice features// 22nd International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Espoo, Finland.
[95]	Wilkman G, Leivisk? T, Heinonen T, Niini M. 2014. On full-scale ship performance measurements// Arctic Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, 1:726-735.
[96]	Yamauchi Y, Mizuno S, Tsukuda H. 2011. The icebreaking performance of Shirase in the maiden Antarctic voyage// 21st International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Maui, Hawaii, USA, 1:1093-1099.
[97]	Yu H, Iyerusalimskiy A, Kim Y S, John J S. 2012. Hull structural performance monitoring system for ships operating in ice-covered waters// Arctic Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, 2:585-590.